Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redveil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominated by a confirmed blocked sockpuppet with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 22:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Redveil

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unable to locate WP:THREE in the article. Fails GNG DavidEfraim (talk) 06:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗ plicit  05:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United States of America. DavidEfraim (talk) 06:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Maryland and Washington, D.C..  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:08, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article needs to be cleaned up, but it already has some reliable sources like Brooklyn Vegan and Pitchfork. The rapper has also been profiled in the reliable Fader, Stereogum , Spin , and HipHopDX . He also has an article in a college newspaper that describes itself as independently edited (as opposed to dependent on the school). Here are some additional album reviews: , , . ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 15:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per Doomsdayer's list of sources, easily clears WP:SINGER. QuietHere (talk) 03:44, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep, it's close, as a lot of the sources are of substandard quality, but I believe the combination of the BV and Pitchfork sources along with the Wonderland Magazine review are enough to showcase a GNG pass. Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:42, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.