Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redwood Asset Management Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Redwood Asset Management Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems like a promotional article. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:14, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article by a WP:SPA account and as the nominator says, consists of material more suited to the company's own site where they are at liberty to promote their fund range. Searches turn up routine fund announcements but I can see nothing that meets WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 05:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've continued to edit the page to increase neutrality - anything further I can do to improve it? *ManonTR (talk) 12:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Sources cited in article are mostly press releases and self-reported financial information.  Company still does not meet notability requirements.  Andrew327 04:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.