Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redwood Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Frankly, the sources look on the thin side but the discussion provides no consensus to delete. There have been two relists and I don't think that yet another relist is justified. TerriersFan (talk) 21:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Redwood Software

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability is not established. An article about a a multinational corporation that specializes in enterprise and business process automation solutions, job scheduling software, report management software, and report distribution software together with its products, with all of information backed up by 2 references: About us page on company's site and a press release. Tagged with refimprove since December 2007. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 09:02, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.


 * Delete. I could find press releases, but nothing really constituting significant independent coverage. The company's products get a few mentions in books, and if anyone can show enough of these to be substantial enough (Google Books doesn't help much here) then it may be enough to keep.--Michig (talk) 10:04, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm usually sceptical about companies, but this is a multinational corporation which has been operating since 1993, so probably deserves a more thorough consideration. I have found these sources   which I believe establish notability. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 12:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Two of those are from companies that Redwood 'partners' with, i.e. they promote each other. The other looks like a company directory listing. --Michig (talk) 13:00, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  06:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Weak keep I was leaning towards deletion, but looking around on LinkedIn shows that there are employees in the US, the UK, the Netherlands, and Germany. Seems like it could merit a article. As the article stands right now, hoever, it is completely useless, especially to people without any knowledge of IT. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Per WP:ORGIN the notability of company can't be inherited from its employees. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 07:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 03:40, 8 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. No independent media notice that I can find. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.