Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reed Solomon Identifier (RSID)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 18:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Reed Solomon Identifier (RSID)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Essentially self-admitted WP:OR; a copy of a technical paper written by the user who posted it. Ironholds (talk) 18:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 21:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Perhaps some content could be merged into Reed–Solomon error correction, but this article doesn't supply enough context for a non-expert editor to do that.  ReverendWayne (talk) 00:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. This article should not be deleted. It is an informative article about a digital technique used in world-wide amateur radio digital communication. Yes, the author created the technique but it has been implemented and used in a number of software applications used by radio operators for digital communications. / No, it should not be merged with Reed Solomon error correction. The use of RS is part of the name to provide a description of the technique. Rmerriam1948 (talk) 01:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Reformatted without altering text. —C.Fred (talk) 01:17, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * — Rmerriam1948 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Strong delete. Absolute lack of independent reliable sources, plus it is written at a level of technical detail above where Wikipedia articles should be. —C.Fred (talk) 01:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - original research, unreferenced, self-promotion New seeker (talk) 12:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.