Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReelAfrican


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete without prejudice. Treating this as an expired PROD with a second. If somebody wants to write a new sourced article from a neutral point of view, it won't be subject to CSD G4. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

ReelAfrican

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non-notable organization with no sources to established notability. Tinton5 (talk) 20:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment The article now includes a reference to an article in Variety.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  07:57, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - The Variety article is a good start, but that is literally the one and only source I was able to find in a brief search. There appears to be no other coverage than that.  &mdash;SW&mdash; speak 16:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.