Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReelHeART International Film Festival


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete is clear following relisting. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

ReelHeART International Film Festival

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear to have received non-trivial coverage by multiple independent reliable sources. Article contains no sources of its own (after 10 years), and an Internet search turns up Twitter, Facebook, IMDb, etc. KDS 4444  Talk  01:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. zero reliable evidence for notability.DGG (talk), 1:34, February 3 2016

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for now as this is a questionably notable local festival. BTW,, you may want to know I was typing this as you relisted (edit conflict). SwisterTwister   talk  02:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a public relations platform on which every film festival that exists gets to keep a profile for promotional purposes — which is indeed at least partially what's going on here, as the article has been extensively edited in the past by User:ReelHeART. But the reliable source coverage needed to support an encyclopedia article about it simply isn't there — on both Google News and ProQuest, it only gets passing hits on mentions of its name in articles about films that have screened at it, and isn't the subject of any coverage that I can locate besides its own self-published press releases on PRWeb. This is not how a film festival gets a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 21:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.