Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reentry Anonymous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Reentry Anonymous

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No independent third party sources provided to verify that the organization is notable. Only third party source is just directory information. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:28, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete While this is certainly a laudable cause, I can't find any reliable secondary sources either. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:17, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - There aren't many third-party notable sources aside from that Florida department source, nothing on Google News. SwisterTwister   talk  05:23, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.