Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rees Bradley Hepburn (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SOFTDELETE The Bushranger One ping only 12:22, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Rees Bradley Hepburn
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Awards are minor and concept of being first carbon neutral advertising agency seems like greenwash. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 Note presence of multiple awards shows notability.Iniciativass (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I've searched news archives and can find no coverage. Don't believe this firm meets WP:GNG. The two newspaper references in the article are dead, EcoArc makes no reference to RBHand the Drum reference is dead, Page is currently practically an advert. SPACKlick (talk) 13:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * What awards have they received that are notable? Could you point me to the sources for those?SPACKlick (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.