Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reese Havens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui 雲 水 11:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Reese Havens

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NBASEBALL and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 06:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of New York Mets first-round draft picks. Spanneraol (talk) 13:12, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - He was the subject of a New York Times profile here. He also has articles about him at least here and here.  There was also at least one article about him and Justin Smoak in the Times and Democrat from June 6, 2008 that doesn't show up in my Google search.  I am pretty sure there was more, possibly offline, since I remember reading about him and not in the Times, but this should be enough to establish notability. Rlendog (talk) 20:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the sources provided above. He fails WP:NBASEBALL, but that's enough to get him ov4er the GNG hump. Smartyllama (talk) 16:36, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of New York Mets first-round draft picks. Coverage is WP:RUNOFTHEMILL for a first round pick and thus doesn't help him get over the GNG hump. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:02, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Most draft picks do not get such coverage, and even first round picks typically do not get profiled in the NY Times, not even Met or Yankee picks. Even if they did, GNG does not make an exception for coverage that is typical of first round draft picks. 16:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG, per Rlendog's sources, which overrides WP:NBASE. Ejgreen77 (talk) 15:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:04, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Eh, clearly fails the notability guidelines for baseball, but may barely pass GNG. Creating this article was probably a case of recentism, but the potential to create a worthwhile article is greater here than other articles on subjects who only play a few games, make it on a box score, and are forgotten.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.