Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reevoo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Reevoo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

may not meet WP:CORPDEPTH: a Google News search for the company's name turns up only and, neither of which is primarily about the company. The business2community.com story cited in the article just presents some information from Reevoo's market research (alongside others') without telling us about the company itself; moreover business2community.com has over 4 000 registered contributors, according to its about page. The internetretailer.com story cited in the article is mainly about Reevoo's market research, with about three sentences concerning the company. Anyone can add information to Crunchbase. — rybec   05:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Seems to be an advert for a company that collects and recycles reviews. I see nothing notable about it.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.