Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reference 36


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Henri Selmer Paris. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference 36

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources provided which might attest to the importance of this subject. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  02:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)




 * Redirect to Henri Selmer Paris or Henri Selmer Paris on the manufacturer's article. There are definitely some references out there such as this mention as a "popular instrument" in an educator's guide and this review in JazzTimes magazine. But it's the tiniest of stubs in its current form and the best end-state might be a small paragraph on the Selmer page. If someone wants to have a go at creating a proper article, then let's discuss notability. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.