Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reference Ex Lighting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:25, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Reference Ex Lighting

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article has insufficient context to make it a valid article, yet more information than would qualify it for speedy deletion Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as of A7. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  17:25, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Armbrust. No references, nothing to read-- NotedGrant  Talk  17:37, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete advertisement, disguised as an article but the tone gives it away ("a leap foreward, and a new benchmark" and so on sounds straight off the brochure). Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Since my original nomination it has been fleshed out and turned into an advert. I support speedy deletion now Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.