Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/References to Star Trek in South Park 2nd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge to References to Star Trek and delete. --Ezeu 06:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

References to Star Trek in South Park
Extreme fancruft. Note that this was previously up for deletion but was kept, the motivation for most of the keep votes being that References to Star Trek in The Simpsons provides a precedent. Well, that page was recently deleted (though it had previously survived an AfD), so the precedent no longer supports keeping this page, but rather deleting it. Precedent or no, this page is unencyclopedic and filled with tenuous fanboy armchair speculations. -lethe talk [ +] 02:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or possibly merge with South Park. M  r.   L  e  fty   Talk to me!  02:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per broken precedent. Danny Lilithborne 02:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete do not merge with South Park for same reasons as AfD nom--expensivehat 02:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete And I'm a fan of stuff like this! Ande B 02:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, of no encyclopedic value. Postdlf 02:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, un encyclopaedic--blue520 02:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I started that first afd and still think this should be deleted per unencyclopedic fancruft. I also think that "precedent" is an invalid argument to begin with as there are tons of other unencyclopedic material out there that haven't been deleted yet.--Jersey Devil 03:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with References to Star Trek, as was apparently done with the Simpsons one at some point. BryanG(talk) 03:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * That merger was out of process, since the result of the debate was delete. -lethe talk [ +] 20:46, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unencyclopedic. --Ter e nce Ong 04:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge after removing speculations. Max S em 06:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with References to Star Trek per BryanG. -SocratesJedi | Talk 07:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per BryanG. -- Tangot a ngo 07:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per BryanG's precedent. Wickethewok 07:26, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per BryanG Ydam 11:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Paddles 13:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per above; nom leaves out critical detail. -- FRCP11 15:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merging is one of the possible results of an AfD debate. In this case however, the result was not merge but delete, and any subsequent merge that was done was out of process, and therefore should not be used as a precedent.  However, I was unaware that it was done, otherwise I would have mentioned it, I'm sorry for the oversight. -lethe talk [ +] 20:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge - Not justified on its own Benjaminstewart05 17:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with References to Star Trek per BryanG (and maybe merge References to Star Trek in Futurama as well?). TheJC TalkContributions 19:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge, just as I suggested with the Simpsons version, and it's unfortunate the result with that one turned out for deletion. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 23:46, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge. Per all above.--Hezzy 00:57, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 04:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete and Do Not Merge Ridiculous fancruft spam Bwithh 16:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. It's not an encyclopedia article. Erik the Rude 18:26, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge per above. Pegasus1138 Talk 02:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to some fansite outside of Wikipedia -- Hirudo 15:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge non-speculative content. Eluchil404 21:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This would become unwieldly on a merged page, but it is notable information. -Branddobbe 03:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete extreme fancruft KleenupKrew 03:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and I kinda like it like Ande B but c'mon, it's fancruft. Jersey Devil point re: "president" is well taken. Possibly Merge with References to Star Trek, per BryanG if that article isn't itself fancruft. Armon 15:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Two very popular shows that merit extensive analysis and coverage. Merge is not a good idea because of length. --JJay 16:42, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Zaxem 11:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not of any help to this encyclopedia; useless information OTAKU 03:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.