Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refik Veseli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Refik Veseli

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent references with regard to the individual. It isn't clear whether this is meant to be about an individual or a group, but it is written as a biography of a non-living person, whose notability isn't stated. Maybe a group article might be more appropriate. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:58, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. I improved the article (still a stub, but a referenced one and better built). He has some notability as a photographer and work on Albanian monuments but his main claim to fame is WWII activities. He has at least 20+ book mentions as well as coverage by TIME, Washington Post, and other majors newspapers/magazines.Icewhiz (talk) 07:22, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - there are plenty reliable sources about him and his life that seem largely to stem from his WWII activities and being honored by Israel. I don't see a BIO1E problem, as the coverage includes other aspects of his life. Smmurphy(Talk) 18:48, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I'm seeing a lot of book results discussing his activities to aid Jews; sample: Resisting the Holocaust: Upstanders, Partisans, and Survivors. Can be developed into an acceptable start class article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.