Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reflective Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Reflective Music

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be a notable record label; an extensive search failed to find enough significant reliable coverage for either the label or any of its artists (none of whom have a Wikipedia article). All I could find were non-independent sites such as artist websites or the label's site itself. Even with more specific searches most of what I could find were false positives. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete on balance. Looks promotional to me. Deb (talk) 11:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete could find nothing notable on the artists on his "clientele roster" none of whom have their pages (not a criteria for notability but if no one has deemed and/or proved that they are notable it is unlikely that their management firm is very notable...) Domdeparis (talk) 10:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.