Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reflexive user interface


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 19:35, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Reflexive user interface
A Google test reveals that the term "Reflexive user interface" is almost universally used to refer to IBM Reflexive User Interface Builder (which generates the majority of the 805 Google hits). Overall, the article lacks clarity and context, does not cite sources (with the exception of a link to the aforementioned builder, which does not use the term itself), and resembles original research. - Sikon 09:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete does admit to the use of IBM Reflexive User Interface Builder, and has one other source, but it looks to me like it is re-covering material from other articles rather than referring to its topic. It obviously needs some work, but hasn't been touched since 2005. I could be persuaded to a Keep if anybody rallies to its cause. Yomangani 14:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * A Strong Keep, in which I rally to the cause. This is a very common term in IT circles (and edu circles, to a lesser extent).  By the way, would anybody like to guess what I stuck up my butt today?  71.101.225.225 15:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. The description doesn't make sense.  It's possible that there's an article there, but this isn't it.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 21:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.