Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reform Party of New Jersey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Reform Party of New Jersey

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Non-notable local branch of a minor party Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  04:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)


 * KeepIt is notable for several reasons, including DiNizio's Senate bid and Goodman's attempt to draft Perot to counteract Buchanan. greenguy89   &#x007C;   Talk  010:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.76.143.87 (talk)
 * Keep. Statewide is not local, and worth listing on the basis of having been notable in the 1995-1998 period. See the Google News archive hits for this organization here -- Eastmain (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.
 * Keep The nominator is incorrect; this is a statewide branch, not a local branch. It appears to have received significant press coverage as well. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 20:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy/Snow Keep. Per all the above.--Epeefleche (talk) 11:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Reform Party of the United States of America. This has been done with state chapters of other parties when there simply isn't enough for a stand alone article. Really, not much in this article. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:41, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.