Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reform Socialist Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. -- RG2 01:59, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Reform Socialist Party

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

article unverifiable, google search shows some hits, but none of them really talk about this party Chris!  c t 03:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * keep-I have heard of it, giveit time to be ref'd. This is premature.JJJ999 04:46, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, having heard of it is not a viable reason to keep, this is totally unsourced and thus fails WP:NOR and WP:V. meshach 04:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * the point is it CAN be sourced. This is premature, let's give it time to get sourced by someone from ItalianWiki or something...user is aklso a long time contributor who is an apparent expert on the subject matter.JJJ999 04:56, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: An AfD debate remains open for 5 days, that's long enough for someone to add some reliable sources. --Darkwind (talk) 05:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The article has been here for seven months and no one has added anything. But it evidence of satisfying WP:N is added I would be willing to reconsider. meshach 05:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It was a political party in Italy, one of the splinter groups of the Italian Socialist Party born in 1993-1996. Its leader is now a leadeing member of Forza Italia. I think it deserves an article. --Checco 11:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable, can be ref'd. — Nightstallion 13:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could a former tiny splinter group have the potential for a useful article? One of two sentences somewhere ... Pavel Vozenilek 00:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keeep The size of the party is not really the factor--if it had any historical significance at all it is notable. DGG (talk) 03:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.