Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reformed Calvinist Church of El Salvador


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn per sources found. Non-admin closing. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Reformed Calvinist Church of El Salvador

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Christian denomination in El Salvador. No secondary sources used in the article except for directory entries, and none seem to exist on GNews. Furthermore, a comment on the talk page about a previous speedy nomination seems to confirm that we should not expect to find anything susceptible to save the article from deletion.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:49, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. StAnselm (talk) 00:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. The church gets coverage in encyclopaedias such as the Historical Dictionary of the Reformed Churches. I found it by searching for the Spanish name (Iglesia Reformada Calvinista de El Salvador) - it is translated there as "Calvinist Reformed Church of El Salvador". The google search got several thousand hits - I suspect there are reliable foreign language sources also providing significant coverage. StAnselm (talk) 02:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. What happened Blanchard, why did you not find it in Google Books? In ictu oculi (talk) 04:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned above, it doesn't come up when searching by the article name. StAnselm (talk) 04:24, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of El Salvador-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I didn't understand your comment as it came up immediately for me. But I suppose that's because I'm not adding " " marks on term when searching. Anyway, this denomination is obviously highly notable, even without starting into all the Spanish sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:51, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.