Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regal Investments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Regal Investments

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I have just done a quick LinkedIn search and did not discover this company being there. The sources do not indicate that they are actually specific to this company. Potentially a paid edit I think? I do not think this article meets WP:NOTE. Ueutyi (talk) 17:12, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, as this does seem quite suspect, especially with a newly-registered account creating Roble Regal (apparently the CEO) straight away, prior to this article. I am not seeing any assertion of notability and the references are questionable in support of the prose; for instance, in the 'Fintech' section, claims about being a "top performing fund" and what they are notable for are not supported by the ref, which is not reliable anyway. Seems like a poor publicity attempt. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:20, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, junk sourcing from unreliable sources and company profiles that do not assert notability. Would fail WP:NCORP. Potential COI/Paid editing, warned user on talk page. Yee no   (talk) 🍁 18:34, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the listed sources are independent of the subject. All of them are the company's profile on various websites, which does not make it notable. Fails WP:GNG and doesn't even come close to satisfying WP:SIGCOV. When I Googled the company, I found nothing but passing mentions. Not even a single article. Helen (💬📖) 01:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete It doesn't have sufficient sources, and is rarely notable, I searched it but there was nothing to make it notable, fails WP:GNG. Cheers.  Tahaaleem  Talk 07:49, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The article does not cite well resources. I am to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content. GermanKity (talk) 12:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.