Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regalix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Regalix

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable marketing agency; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, interviews / quotes to the media, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. There are plenty of major references to this company from credible sources such as Bloomberg, BusinessWeek, and also they are Inc5000 company. Passes Wiki criteria for notability. WP:ORGCRITE WP:ORGIND WP:CORPDEPTH Expertwikiguy (talk) 2:40 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Perhaps I'm missing something. You've stated that the references pass WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. But, obviously, this reference from CIOReview doesn't have an attributed journalist and fails WP:RS. It is also extensively relying on an interview with the CEO and is not intellectually independent, therefore failing WP:CORPDEPTH *and* WP:ORGIND. I've also looked at the other references and found issues with each. Do you mind posting the links for two specific references that you believe meet the criteria for establishing notability so that I can determine if my !vote below needs a revisit? Thank you.  HighKing++ 20:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 05:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No indications of notability, Wikipedia is not a business directory or yellow pages. References are either run-of-the-mill business listings in the likes of Bloomberg and inc.com or rely on quotations/interviews with company officers. Topic fails GNG, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND.  HighKing++ 20:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.