Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regcure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 03:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Regcure

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Spam article, not encyclopedic  Socrates2008 (  Talk  )   23:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I wouldn't decribe this as "spam" as it is about a real product. However, the article fails to assert notability through the use of independent verifiable sources and must therefore be deleted. It also reads like an advertisement.Insearchofintelligentlife (talk) 01:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment That's pretty much the definition of WP:SPAM, at least for Wikipedia purposes. --Dhartung | Talk 06:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, no attribution of notability to independent sources. There are some indicators that it's fairly popular but not much in Google News Archive for an article. --Dhartung | Talk 06:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Any program of which the only review is by the program manufacturers themselves ("RegCure Review by RegCureGuide") is pretty much a no-brainer for WP:SPAM.  -- simxp (talk) 11:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possibly salvageable, but not as it exists currently. Trusilver  06:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Potential, not just current state, i.e. does not appear to be hoax, well presented, but could use better sources. If anyone has any computer or conusmer reports magazines, they can help.  Please also note that User:Insearchofintelligentlife has been blocked for using AfD disruption and sockpuppetry.  Sincerely, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 23:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Insearchofintelligentlife and Dhartung. BWH76 (talk) 16:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems like NN software. If it clearly showed natability, this would change. ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 22:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.