Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regency Parliamentary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Regency Parliamentary

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Proposed deletion for lack of sources and context, WP:PROD tag removed without reason, but article update reveals that this is a mere idea: "The Regency Parliamentary is a new idea, and there are no countries using this system, however, it may please the fans of the moviments like pro-monarchy or pro-parliamentry and may please the people that isn't fans of these moviments but like the democracy and rights of every citizen." Tikiwont (talk) 07:18, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- when this article was first started I had some hope that it would turn out to describe a real-world phenomenon, but it apparently doesn't. Fails WP:V, WP:NOR. Melchoir (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. If someone wants to propose a new kind of government system, Wikipedia is not the place for the idea to make its debut. Wikipedia is interested in such proposals only if they have received significant attention elsewhere first. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:24, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Suggest a SNOW delete as the most obvious self-declared original research.    DGG ( talk ) 03:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.