Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regenestem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  02:25, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Regenestem

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Article started in 2016 by a SPA, using sources that contain almost exclusively passing mentions. NoonIcarus (talk) 02:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Science,  and Medicine. NoonIcarus (talk) 02:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Coverage in sources is only trivial and not significant, not meeting WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Additionally, I question the independence of some of these sources. ProofRobust  12:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the sources meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 15:21, 23 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.