Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regenomics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Regenomics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NEO issues. The purported sources do not support the topic. Actually most of them don't even mention the word. Guy (Help!) 22:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, neologism with no currency and not mentioned by the references - David Gerard (talk) 15:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete The sources given look like a blog and a bunch of stuff which doesn't mention the article name. While you can find the term in scholarly papers, the papers don't give extensive coverage of the term itself, as far as I can see. Nwlaw63 (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.