Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reggiimental


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Reggiimental

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Autobiography that shows no real notability for the subject. Article suffers from Citation overkill and when you remove the shops, blogs, youtube, unreliable sources, articles about someone else (notability is not inherited), interviews talking about themselves, links that don't work, we are not left with anything near the significant coverage required for notability. A search for sources find nothing more. Previously deleted at ReggiiMental (Articles for deletion/ReggiiMental). duffbeerforme (talk) 09:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, borderline speedy G4. Promotional page for an aspiring rapper who hopes that piling a bunch of articles that don't mention him, random websites that do mention him, plus several deadlinks, will confuse people into thinking he somehow might pass WP:MUSICBIO.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 03:03, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.