Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regify


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Regify

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable software company; again, sourcing is mostly regurgitated press releases. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  19:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Press releases and articles written by employees seem to be the extent of coverage here. These sources do not establish notability. - MrOllie (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Could not find reliable, third-party sources to support its claim to notability. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  01:01, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  02:47, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:12, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.