Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reginald L. Austin, Ph.D.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shimeru (talk) 21:42, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Reginald L. Austin, Ph.D.

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No G News and only trivial G search results  C T J F 8 3  chat 20:48, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. (GregJackP (talk) 21:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC))
 * Delete Has apparently written three or four papers, with low citation rates, according to google scholar, adn one short monograph, probably an MA thesis. Most professors in the physical sciences have done at least as much. (BTW, titles such as "PhD" are not usually used in article names. Would reconsider if additional sources are presented that seem to indicate greater notability. DES (talk) 21:35, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, sources provided do not establish notability. Tim Vickers (talk) 05:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable as a scientist (the number of papers correspond to the typical requirements for a Swedish Ph.D. in sciences - and in biomedicine people tend to publish a lot...), and you don't get notable by starting your own PR agency. Tomas e (talk) 17:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.