Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional Air Services (Romania)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:46, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Regional Air Services (Romania)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A flying school with no sign of notability or any different to the hundreds of other such organisations. MilborneOne (talk) 19:23, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MilborneOne (talk) 19:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, because WP:CORP is not met. This company has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable independent sources. The references used for the Wikipedia article provide no in-depth analysis of this flying school, but only mention it in passing.--FoxyOrange (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:58, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 4 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, as per nom. Fails WP:CORP ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   06:23, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete, Solaryx (talk) 10:10, 9 October 2013 (UTC)I did some extensive research about this company, they are not only a flight school accredited by the local authorities, but more than that, they are a air transportation company they own and operate an airport (code LRTZ) and they do own and operate airplanes as assets to serve the flight school as well as banner towing, crop dusting, recreational tours and other similar non-scheduled flights. Sure, as a flight school they may not be notable at international level, but my personal opinion is that they deserve a page, even if it's just for the fact that they own and operate a real airport.Solaryx (talk) 10:10, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No matter what kind of a company, WP:CORP must be passed.--FoxyOrange (talk) 10:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.