Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional Best 2011


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  23:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Regional Best 2011

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Regional Best was published twice, in 2011 and 2012. In these anthologies, William Roetzheim, an entrepreneur who took up writing later in life, and who became as novelist, playwright and poet of no great renown, has chosen the best plays from among regional theater premieres. But since Roetzheim is not particularly well-known as a playwright or theater critic, his selections as to what constitutes the "best" plays is somewhat arbitrary and meaningless. The book was published by Level 4 Press which, unsurprisingly, is owned by Roetzheim. No significant notice of this book can be found in any search, although it does appear to be widely available for sale. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:51, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:51, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note that the creator of this article has been blocked as part of a large sockfarm whose purpose appeared to be to create promotional Wikipedia articles.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  21:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.