Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional Science High School for Region III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. TerriersFan (talk) 15:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Regional Science High School for Region III

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Article has been proposed for speedy deletion back in January, there are no references/reliable sources in the article some with WP:LISTCRUFT violations. ApprenticeFan talk  contribs 01:16, 9 December 2009 (UTC) —TerriersFan (talk) 02:44, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - no valid grounds for deletion have been specified; all the nominator's concerns can be met by editing. Not only is this a high school but it has been the subject of a published study. Filipino schools traditionally have a poor internet presence in English so local sources need to be added in due course. We should be wary of systemic bias. TerriersFan (talk) 02:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - nomination seems like systematic bias. I don't see any WP:LISTCRUFT or WP:COI issues that would require the deletion of the article.--Abusing (talk) 03:54, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.
 * Keep With the listcruft cleaned up and the scientific study referenced, the issue the nominator raised has been resolved. - Mgm|(talk) 10:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn as now. Mgm said that the references are now added in the article. ApprenticeFan  talk  contribs 10:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.