Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional organizers and events of Model United Nations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Majorly   (hot!)  11:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Regional organizers and events of Model United Nations

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article consisted of simply links to various websites for model UN organizations. The article has simply been used to advertise various conference and contains few links to other articles within of Wikipedia. I have attempt to cleanup the article however I only encountered more attempts to use the article as an advertisement, and have since questioned its notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astuishin (talk • contribs) 04:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. I have almost no tolerance for external link farms, and that's what this article is. YechielMan 05:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep' - Or move to Wikiversity. --Remi 07:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Why? This isn't a vote. MER-C 08:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - directory of external links. MER-C 08:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete external link farm, fails WP:NOT. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * keep, clean. Please allow me to disargee with some negative votes:
 * this is not linkspam. These are educational organizations that deserve respect.
 * this is not link farm. This is list of organizations, with brief desctriptions, potentially expandable. By strange coincidence each of them has a website.
 * I fail to see how it is used to "advertise" more than any other article. Also, annual conferences are quite notable things, in opinions of many.
 * A better approach would be to establish stricter criteria for inclusion, in accordance with wikipedia rules. For example, the title says "regional". What does this mean? What is the size of the region? Monucipal district? Country?. I wold say that at least statewide orgs have right to be listed, together with orgs sufficietly notable to have a wikipedia article. `'mikka 16:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.