Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regions of Republika Srpska (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete all. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:46, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Banja Luka Region
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )



This article is already deleted, but next few articles on non-existent regions are even more senseless without this. Republika Srpska is not divided in regions, see previous discusion. This untrue fact has spread all across Wikipedia.

Articles that should be deleted are:


 * Banja Luka Region
 * Trebinje Region
 * Bijeljina Region
 * Doboj Region
 * Foča Region
 * Vlasenica Region
 * Sarajevo-Romanija Region

Templates (and their corresponding categories) that should be deleted (and replaced are)


 * Template:BanjaLukaRegion-geo-stub
 * Template:TrebinjeRegion-geo-stub
 * Template:BijeljinaRegion-geo-stub
 * Template:DobojRegion-geo-stub
 * Template:FočaRegion-geo-stub
 * Template:VlasenicaRegion-geo-stub
 * Template:SarajevoRomanijaRegion-geo-stub

--  Bojan   Talk   06:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete the articles, they are clearly WP:OR. We had noticed this a long time ago, but it fell through the cracks, maybe it should even be speedy deleted... But, fact remains that stub sorting is useful, so these stub categories and templates should be renamed into just "BanjaLuka-geo-stub" etc, avoiding the idea that each of them is a Region(TM) and making it clear it's simply a geographical distinction. Perhaps some of them could be renamed further, e.g. if the geographical region of RS near Trebinje is best described as "East Herzegovina", then use that, or similar. Either way, WP:AFD is not WP:SFD. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 09:33, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


 * BTW the AFD process isn't complete, you still need to place AFD tags on Foča Region and Sarajevo-Romanija Region... --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 09:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Which are the administrative divisions of Republika Srpska btw? I can´t find it by now... FkpCascais (talk) 21:22, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 07:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisting comment: This AfD was malformed and has been fixed. The seven-day clock should start to run at the time of the relisting. T. Canens (talk) 07:44, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per the arguments made at the "previous discusion" link — these articles have virtually nothing other than nonexistent political geography, so keeping them to permit reworking wouldn't help at all. About the stubs: the whole reason that we have SFD is to simplify discussions that would otherwise require both a CFD and a TFD.  In the spirit of simplifying discussions, I'd suggest that this discussion be used for deciding to delete or not to delete the stub templates (they're quite obviously dependent on the articles), and that we then transclude this discussion at SFD to ensure that its regulars don't miss out on this discussion.  Nyttend (talk) 04:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.