Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regpack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 19:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Regpack

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet WP:NSOFTWARE Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 16:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing here really rings the notability bell. Sources generally do not satisfy RS and look like fluff pieces. The article is highly promotional. If someone wanted to CSD this per G-11 I would not disagree. Article fails GNG and NSOFTWARE. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete both article and sources are advertisements, except for the author's Ph.D. thesis (which is obviously primary and hasn't received any citations, according to GScholar). Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:58, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.