Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regress argument


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Closing as speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT#1 - the nominator does not advance any argument for deletion or redirection, rather they propose a merge, and no one else recommends that the page be deleted or redirected. Discussion about a merge can be taken forward on the article talk page per WP:MERGE. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:59, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Regress argument

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Suggest merging with Munchhausen trilemma as these describe the same problem. 37KZ (talk) 15:55, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Many philosophers have considered this and I'm most familiar with Charles Dodgson's formulation. Anyway, there are many notable approaches to this and so it's not clear that merger is appropriate.  And merger is not done by deletion so AfD is not an appropriate process. Andrew🐉(talk) 01:17, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Procedural close as per User:Andrew Davidson. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.