Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regular Ordinary Swedish Meal Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 20:20, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Regular Ordinary Swedish Meal Time

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page page was created by the creators of this Youtube series (see the discussion thread, where the article creator introduced themselves). Until last night it had no citations that weren't just links to their own site, and when a Speedy Deletion template was thrown up it was quickly removed by another anonymous IP and a few SVT links tossed up, and by the comments it looks again like the only editor on that page is the person running Regular Ordinary Swedish Meal Time. Even with a couple of links to SVT, it really doesn't seem like a small Youtube channel whose only media coverage is in a foreign language meets WP:Notability, otherwise we're pretty much saying that every temporarily popular internet video should have its own Wikipedia page. There may be a time for this article, but it doesn't seem to be now. Piuro (talk) 15:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Not saying that it should be kept (nor that it shouldn't), but why would it matter that the subject's media coverage isn't in English?--In Donaldismo Veritas (talk) 08:18, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Because of what it is, it's a minor youtube video that has anything resembling notability primarily in another language. Even as a Swedish speaker myself, I can't see how this should be the standard to which youtube hits are held. If it is, then we open the door to a whole host of youtube videos from all over the world that benefited from a slow news day. Piuro (talk) 13:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * There's nothing to add more than delete per nom. Bearian (talk) 22:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom reasons. The various references all go to sites that show the video, not actual articles discussing the series itself. A gsearch didn't bring anything up that would show notability.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:38, 15 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Comment: And in response to the "if _____ has an article then why not us" comment on the article's talk page, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument, although I don't think they were saying that in a serious tone of voice. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.