Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regular coffee for a regular guy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:00, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Regular coffee for a regular guy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NN publication, autobiography of unpublished WP:NN person, possible hoax. Toddst1 (talk) 22:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * speedy as patent nonsense hoax. Merkin's mum 23:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:Crystal. 99.230.152.143 (talk) 00:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - probable hoax and wouldn't pass WP:N anyway.-- Beloved Freak  23:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete NN autobiography, NN autobiographer. Probable hoax. — 97198   talk  07:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete possible hoax created by a SPA. Colin Sheehan himself doesn't have an article, not notable and no relevant Google News hits Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 15:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete ...and in any case, not notable per WP:BK. JohnCD (talk) 20:59, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. Gtg289m (talk) 14:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as my search only turned up the aticle page. Plus, it probably doesn't help that the author's page is a redlink.  So, I would say it is more likely than not a hoax.  Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 17:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.