Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regulatory Council for Spiritual Healers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

It appears to have already been deleted by User:Jimfbleak as (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content): no independent sources). Non admin closure. Edgepedia (talk) 13:55, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Regulatory Council for Spiritual Healers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Jay Σεβαστός discuss  10:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons given. Eeekster (talk) 10:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Zero hits on Google News for either "Regulatory Council for Spiritual Healers" or "Healer Practitioner Regulatory Council".  Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 12:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not up to Wikipedia standards. I don't see how it is notable. Also no references. IJA (talk) 16:15, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, although I'm pleased to see that spiritual healers are concerned about the integrity of their profession. Pburka (talk) 19:26, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.