Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rehmat Aziz Chitrali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 13:53, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Rehmat Aziz Chitrali

 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * I checked almost all interwikis, it seems all articles created by one person which is the article owner himself, it seems that this person is not notable and somehow using wikipedia to promote his work Mardetanha  talk 10:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per lack of news coverage, which I didn't find any on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister   talk  05:49, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Wow! What an impressive bio. Too bad that none of the "references" actually mention him. And unless they were clairvoyant, I don't think that books published in the 1930s ("Further reading") mention him either. Blatant self-promotion. --Crusio (talk) 06:32, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant secondary sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:20, 27 July 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete. Subject fails WP:BIO, WP:SOAP, WP:SECONDARY and WP:INDY. Yoninah (talk) 08:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.