Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reichskriminalpolizeiamt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  Ethically  Yours! 12:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Reichskriminalpolizeiamt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

We already have this article at Kriminalpolizei. Hoops gza (talk) 17:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't see a problem with this article. It expands on the summary content at Kriminalpolizei, and adds some further details. So keep. In the unlikely case that this is deleted, don't forget to redirect to Kriminalpolizei. —Kusma (t·c) 09:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge. It is really redundant and the early history can be merged into the Kriminalpolizei article. The Reichskriminalpolizeiamt was absorbed and became known as Amt V (Department V), the Criminal Police in the RSHA. The article is not needed. It is not the same as the Gestapo-apples and oranges. The Kriminalpolizei article should cover its whole history in one place. Kierzek (talk) 01:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. No argument for deletion has been brought forward so far. Kriminalpolizei is a more general article on plain-cloths police in Germany (also a bit lopsided at the moment regarding the Nazi era). Whereas nobody would seriously argue to merge Gestapo into the RSHA article, although it shared the fate of the RKPA. ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 17:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:24, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Separate, defined organisation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Satisfies GNG. No valid rationale for deletion offered. AfD isn't for merger proposals. James500 (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.