Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reidar Finsrud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:41, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Reidar Finsrud

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability of the subject is not established. atnair (talk) 16:51, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. While I don't read Norwegian, the subject's article on Norwegian Wikipedia provides two apparently reliable external links (albeit from the same regional newspaper), and the GNews search above shows articles from other Norwegian newspapers of apparently equivalent quality. What we do need, however, is a Norwegian-reading editor who can actually incorporate citations from some of those sources into the article. PWilkinson (talk) 22:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 00:35, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - a quick google-search suggest that he is notable. I also found his entry in Store Norske Leksikon, which should be enough to claim notability. Mentoz86 (talk) 08:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep entry in a printed, general-purposed encyclopedia is sufficient to establish notability. Arsenikk (talk)  15:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.