Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reji Philip


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Reji Philip

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't pass WP:PROF. Although I see a h-index of 15 from citations-gadget, I don't think that alone would be sufficient. — Pewfly (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:59, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 17:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * delete Absolutely fails WP:PROF. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:12, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Passing mention in a couple news hits, most of the hits are for different people with the same name. I agree with the nominator that the h-index looks ok, but looking closely at the books and scholar hits there is nothing to show notability.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:PROF.  MisterRichValentine    (talk)  16:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.