Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rejoice (Sawyer Brown album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Sawyer Brown discography.  MBisanz  talk 02:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Rejoice (Sawyer Brown album)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Absolutely no reliable sources; no third party reviews, nothing. Was distributed exclusively through a small Christian book and gift shop chain that doesn't have its own article. Only source I could find was the band's own website. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * True, so delete per the nom. I did look at Sawyer Brown on the wiki, but I still have never heard of him either, and I listen to a lot of country music =]   K50   Dude   ROCKS!   20:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, a.) Sawyer Brown is a five-piece band, not a singular entity; b.) They haven't had a Top 40 hit in 8 years, and c.) They're on Curb, a label notorious for not promoting any artist except Tim McGraw. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Band is very notable and has won lots of awards. I could see an argument for a merge, but deletion seems unwarranted given the bands notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:41, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Notability isn't inherited though. Albums are only notable if there's something more to say about them than a tracklist.  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: agree with nominator. JamesBurns (talk) 01:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sawyer Brown discography. The band is notable enough, but the limited release of this album and lack of media attention to it  suggest that it does not warrant a separate article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 09:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 10:18, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NALBUMS. Abecedare (talk) 22:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.