Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reka Ebergenyi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Badly sourced BLP tips the balance. Courcelles 03:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Reka Ebergenyi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nomination following WP:Prod tag removal, article has no sources that show that this person meets the general notability guide. News search, book search. That policy states that article's subject must have "significant coverage", which "means that sources address the subject directly in detail." No sources found that do so, name appears a part of larger listing. Aaron Brenneman (talk) 06:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No substantive news coverage. Next to no runway work. She has a number of covers, but not on any particularly important magazines. One appearance in the Sport's Illustrated Swimsuit Issue and the VS fashion show is not enough. Given her age and her recent credits, her career is basically over. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I think both a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue and a Victoria's Secret Fashion Show is significant enough confer notability.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.