Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relationships for incarcerated individuals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Relationships for incarcerated individuals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prod removed by IP user without reason. Although this is well written and referenced this reads like a thesis - WP is not a publisher of not a publisher of original thought Gbawden (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep is a bit essay-ish, but not enough to sink it. does have oodles of RS. Cramyourspam (talk) 16:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep I don't think it's even that essay-ish. Even if it was, style is not a notability criteria. Bottom line it's referenced well enough to prove notability. Keep. Finnusertop (talk &#124; guestbook &#124; contribs) 19:09, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Cramyourspam. This is classic essay.  However, I think it is a notable topic as can be shown. AfD is not for clean-up or criticism. Bearian (talk) 16:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable topic, sources are reliable and on topic. I am One of Many (talk) 06:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.