Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relaxer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 06:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Relaxer
Finishing incomplete nomination; no opinion. Anville 21:03, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. As it is, this smacks of dicdef but a good cleanup and expansion could make it a useful article. Eddie.willers 01:58, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as it's more than dicdef now. Interesting to boot. Ifnord 03:47, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Ifnord --Rogerd 03:06, 20 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.