Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RelayFax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:32, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

RelayFax

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be non-WP:notable product. A couple of independent mentions in google books, but that's it. The so-called CNET review is a run-of-the-mill download page containing "Publisher's Description" and one reader/user-contributed review, which said it sucked (and gave it one star out of five). Tijfo098 (talk) 11:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Whether it sucks or not is irrelevant. I thought it was notable when I created it 6 years ago. We were all n00bs once :-) Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 21:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:14, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability of this software. Above, article creator has voted for deletion. (six years ago the notability and sourcing criteria were much more loosely enforced) Dialectric (talk) 02:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete agree that Google books mentions do not constitute significant coverage. --Cerebellum (talk) 13:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.