Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Release The Stars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was capmove to Release the Stars, then Redirect/merge to Rufus Wainwright as compromise solution that addresses all the issues raised. ~ trialsanderrors 20:08, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Release The Stars

 * — (View AfD)

Unsourced crystal balling. Pure speculation. "Little more is known of the project". Contested prod. MER-C 12:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom, but put what little content there is on the Rufus Wainwright page. Akihabara 13:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Straight from Wainwright's webpage: "Rufus' next studio album will be titled, 'Release The Stars.'"  Is no longer crystal-ballism. --12:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There's not much there, but it'll just be recreated in two months anyway. If deleted, endorse merge. --Kchase T 06:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  20:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. We know the project exists, and, as Kchase says, there's no point in deleting it if it'll just be recreated when the album comes out. Amnewsboy 10:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge into Rufus Wainwright entry. I agree with Akihabara - there's no need for a separate entry for an album title whether it exists now or will in the future.TruthGal 02:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * "Delete and merge" is discouraged by the GFDL. It's not a good option.--Kchase T 02:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Neither the words "delete" nor "merge" are mentioned in the GFDL entry you cite. But if it really bothers you, then consider my vote to be just a simple Delete. TruthGal 14:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry for my poor choice of linking. It's probably in the full legalese text, but I'm just repeating what a dozen other admins have told me before.--Kchase T 21:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.