Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relentless (drink)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Relentless (drink)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable beverage. The only links close to sources are basically hosted press releases. Not to mention that this article is a spam-fest, but if you took out all the spam there would be nothing to write about. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  08:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  —▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  08:07, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is a product made by The Coca-Cola Company which has been sold for five years now. Although the article should probably have some of the content cut as being unsourced and/or too promotional, there appears to be enough news coverage relating to the product to justify having an article. Problems with the article can be dealt with through normal editing. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Needs a major rewrite, but not the spam-fest you make it out to be. There is a lot of original research that needs to be cut, but that's easy: we could also try to reference it. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:48, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * We who? It has no sources except for press releases and photos on a blog. There is no notability for this product, not even as a Coca-Cola product. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  23:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. The page is for a product, it just needs a major rewrite. Sounds too like advertising at the moment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.142.144 (talk) 07:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. While the article does need a lot of cleanup and the additon of more references, it does have significant coverage in the news to be kept, partly in light to the fact the beverage is currently the subject of a trademark case, which I think is quite a lot to write about. I have done some work on the article to clean it up a bit, but this article needs improvement, not deletion. Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  16:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as notability has been established. As others have stated, it needs cleanup to bring it up to standards.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 22:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.