Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliance Global Corporate Security


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Reliance Industries. Given that has indeffed Pervezmusk, the disruption should stop and allow the editorial process to proceed. Star  Mississippi  22:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reliance Global Corporate Security

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I tagged this CSD (A7, G11). Deleted but Recreated. Again CSD'd by another editor as G4, but this time rejected because it "the article has never been deleted via WP:AFD", so here for a definitive delete and hopefully some salt since this has been recreated by what I think is a COI editor.

Fails GNG, CORP, Promotional.  // Timothy :: talk  21:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC) Why are you accusing me for promoting product or company — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervezmusk. (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India,  and Maharashtra.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: NN business. Fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 22:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Reliance Industries as this isn't independently notable per WP:CORP. Technically, this could be speedily closed since you haven't actually explained why the article should be deleted - having been speedily deleted before is not a valid reason. SmartSE (talk) 10:37, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Question: Here is the series of events, please tell me what I should have done different:
 * Article created for the first time by Pervezmusk
 * Article tagged for CSD per A7 and G11 by TimothyBlue, then deleted by Jimfbleakas as A7 and G11
 * Article is recreated by Pervezmusk.
 * Article is tagged as CSD G4 by another editor (not me)
 * Second CSD is rejected by SmartSE as not meeting G4
 * TimothyBlue understands that a THIRD CSD post would only be contested and removed by Pervezmusk so then posts to AfD with a explanation of the nonsense at CSD (see above).
 * Pervezmusk removes AfD tags (validting my judgement that they would have contested another CSD.
 * point out my flaws. Pervezmusk continues along, without even a peep.
 * I'm obviously in the wrong I need to know why.  // Timothy :: talk  15:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I looked again after considering the above evidence and Pervezmusk has added additional sources to the article since nomimation, showing the flaws in my BEFORE, and I have found more and have added them to the article. Hopefully will be able to use them to expand the article. There will be more non-English sources that a language expert should review before deletion. Based on new sources and the flawed nomination this should be kept. Smartse is correct the nomination does not explain a rational for deletion, does not address sources in article, and failed CSDs are not a reason for deletion. I cannot withdraw because of the votes above, but I would if I could, so others should consider this a withdrawl based on new sources.  // Timothy :: talk  15:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

It is ok atleast you understand your mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervezmusk. (talk • contribs) 16:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


 * You very welcome; hopefully other editors will understand my comments. If you want your vote to be clear, you should change your statement above to begin with "*Keep" (in bold). Guidelines allow you to keep researching and adding references and expanding the article while this discussion is ongoing.  // Timothy :: talk  16:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervezmusk. (talk • contribs) 16:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge with Reliance Industries: Non-notable subsidiary, fails WP:NCORP as a stand-alone article. A couple of database type sources, a primary source and the one decent source is more focused on Reliance as a whole, mentioning several security related subsidiaries.    Ravensfire  (talk) 00:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

please do not merge my article with Reliance limited. This article should be standalone article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervezmusk. (talk • contribs) 04:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment Editors doubting determination to preserve their article should note how committed they are to removing AFD templates. ,,,,, .  // Timothy :: talk  12:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

yes i am preserving this article because of fear of deletion of my article and my hardwork — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervezmusk. (talk • contribs) 13:36, 31 March 2023 (UTC) Hello, can someone remove please AFD templates — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervezmusk. (talk • contribs) 15:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify. This article shouldn't have been published as it wasn't and still isn't ready for mainspace. As it stands, there's only the one source from The Hindu that supports notability. Therefore doesn't pass GNG/NCORP. As it's a new article and there seems to have been a cock-up in procedure, rather than delete, the article could be moved to draftspace and the author given more time to develop it. Rupples (talk) 01:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)


 * No. And please learn to sign your posts. I've told you 3 times on your talk page. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:40, 3 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Merge with Reliance Industries Fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.